The burden of 'proof of human' sits on the wrong side of this equation of the reader's assumption, not the writer's output. If I happen to write clearly, think precisely, and string a sentence together without apology, I don't think that's evidence of a machine. That's evidence of a standard worth keeping.
The burden of 'proof of human' sits on the wrong side of this equation of the reader's assumption, not the writer's output. If I happen to write clearly, think precisely, and string a sentence together without apology, I don't think that's evidence of a machine. That's evidence of a standard worth keeping.
This is a great take
Thanks I was going for a Severance vibe 😎